Search for: "Jones v. Haynes" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2020, 8:56 am by Kate Fort
The other judges, from the left side of the bench around to the right were: Oldham Duncan Willett Higginson Haynes Elrod Stewart Smith Owen Jones Wiener Dennis Southwick Graves Jr. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
  No, it’s from one of the opening paragraphs in the 3rd Circuit’s decision last year in US v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 3:20 am by INFORRM
Indeed, the joint judgment of Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ in Dow Jones & Co. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am by Josh Blackman
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court decided Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
According to the denial of rehearing order, In the en banc poll, eight judges voted in favor of rehearing (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Oldham), and nine judges voted against rehearing (Judges Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez). [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:40 pm
The opinion was written by Judge Edith Jones, and joined by Judges Jennifer Elrod and Catharina Haynes. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:33 am by Giesela Ruehl
Fabrizio Marrella (Venice, Italy); on panel two: Elie Kleiman (Jones Day, Paris, France) and Prof. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
” Thirteen judges agreed with the conclusion though twelve (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reversed on lenity grounds while eight members (Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson) reversed on the ground that federal law unambiguously fails to cover non-mechanical bump stocks. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
Twelve members (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reverse on lenity grounds. [read post]
3 May 2017, 7:04 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Higginbotham wrote a response to the dissent, and Judge Jones followed by briefly noting that the response should not be confused with a precedential opinion (EEOC v. [read post]